
| |||||||||||||||
| Name | Position (e.g. Headteacher, parent, etc.) | Organisation |
|---|---|---|
| Mrs Ann Stone | Teacher KS1 | Acorns PS |
| Mrs Janine Whitehead | Parent | Acorns PS |
| Mrs Alex West | Parent | Acorns PS |
| Mrs Jacqui Brown | Governor | Acorns PS |
| Mrs Jane O'Sullivan | Teacher Early Years | Acorns PS |
The key skills, strengths and roles of each team member are: (200 words)
Ann Stone
Experienced KS1 teacher and science co-ordinator for the school. Having taught at Acorns for over 10 years, Ann brings a wealth of teaching experience and local contacts. She is very excited by the prospect of developing innovative ways of bringing science to young children.
Janine Whitehead
Parent of two KS1 children and qualified physics teacher.
A parent governor for Acorns with responsibility for science, Janine has over 13 years' experience of teaching science in secondary schools, both in the UK and abroad, and so brings fresh ideas and perspective on how to prepare children for KS3.
Alex West
Parent of children in KS2 & nursery. A chemical physics graduate working as the owner manager of a technology based business, Alex brings organisational and budgeting skills as well as enthusiasm for the subject.
Jacqui Brown
Chair of Governors. An active partner in her family construction business, Jacqui brings invaluable practical knowledge of how to cost, source and build our project.
Jane O'Sullivan
Foundation Stage teacher and practising artist. An Acorns teacher for four years, Jane brings her expertise in early years strategy, something we consider very important in making our project accessible to the whole school.
Topic area of proposal: Physical Processes - Forces and motion
Briefly, the aim of our proposal is: (50 words)
Our school currently has a derelict enclosed outdoor space with budget already earmarked for clearance and surfacing. Winning this prize would give us a unique opportunity to fill this space with an inspirational scientific learning centre.
Our proposal intends to achieve a thorough familiarity with fundamental physical principles and processes through continual exposure in a play setting combined with formal lessons.
We aim to achieve this by installing a wide variety of simple machines and robust experiments. All staff will then be encouraged and supported to embrace teaching physics-based investigations to all ages.
Pupil type to benefit: All
Age range to benefit from proposal: 3-11
Learning outcomes from our proposal: (50 words)
Our reasons for developing this particular proposal: (100 words)
Ofsted has recently identified science teaching in our school as inadequate.
Despite its rural location, the school has few play facilities and outdoor learning opportunities.
We also felt that there was a distinct lack of projects promoting the physical sciences in primary schools, especially to the very young, and that given the team's backgrounds we could be very successful in developing and supporting this aspect of science across all age ranges.
Consultation with the school science co-ordinator, governors and parents identified a real enthusiasm for a practical and new resource to help overcome teachers’ lack of confidence in this area.
Detailed description of our proposal: (300 words)
We propose to equip our courtyard as follows:
All of these items are either available commercially or can be constructed more economically using the expertise of the team and the assistance of local craftsmen. They can be maintained and replaced gradually within the existing school budget.
The areas will all be developed in such a way that they can be used in a relatively unsupervised, unstructured way during playtime, whilst also being adaptable for lesson time.
Information packs explaining all principles will be produced to help teachers and assistants plan their lessons around each topic. Children can then be guided towards workable investigations that will enable achievements up to level 5.
Key scientific vocabulary will be posted at each location as prompts for older children and adult supervisors.
This satisfies the requirements for improvements in science teaching detailed in our SIDP, by helping us to develop the skills-based curriculum and familiarising the science subject leader (Ann) with practical physics.
Additionally, other small local schools will be encouraged to collaborate and exchange ideas for further lessons, whilst enjoying regular class visits.
Outline of how our team would implement our proposal over a period of not more than 24 weeks: (300 words, bulleted lists accepted)
Planning Phase:
On announcement of finalists - Janine produces/distributes a press release to announce start of project.
Week 1
Week 2
Week 3
Week 4
Week 5
Week 6
Building Phase:
Week 7
Week 8
Weeks 9-12
Week 13
Development Phase:
Weeks 14-15
Weeks 16-17
Weeks 18-19
Week 20
Week 21
Week 22
Week 23
Alex completes final budget review.
Week 24
The monitoring procedures we will use during the project are: (200 words, bulleted lists accepted)
Our whole team will meet fortnightly on Friday afternoon at the school during the duration of the project. During these meetings the following agenda items will always be included:
If it is felt that an additional meeting is required due to the speed of progress at that point or any problems encountered, it will then be scheduled for the following Friday.
Ann will also organise for the children to keep a photo diary as a record of weekly activity on the site, both for discussion at the meetings and for a storyboard to present at the grand opening.
The evaluation procedures we will use at the end of the 25 weeks to check the effectiveness of our project are: (200 words, bulleted lists accepted)
Evaluation of success in children's learning:
Evaluation of success in teachers' confidence:
Evaluation of physical space and equipment:
Lesson observation will assess
Thorough physical inspection of the equipment at 4 & 9 weeks of use to assess level of wear and tear.
School council to investigate appreciation of the facility by the pupils via questionnaire and interviews.
All findings to be extrapolated into an inspection, maintenance and replacement program for the future.
Itemised costs of putting your proposal into practice within a maximum budget of £5,000 or equivalent in Euros:
| Budget Item | Cost (GBP) |
|---|---|
| Preparation, clearance, levelling, tarmac and safer turf - within school budget | 0 |
| Purchase of factory produced items, i.e. mirrors, cascade, periscope, gears etc | 650 |
| Purchase of all raw materials for other items i.e. circuit trail, panels, etc | 950 |
| Craftsmen's time to construct and install all equipment incl. plumbing | 1600 |
| Durable tables, chairs, bins and other outdoor furniture | 750 |
| Supply cover for Jane and Ann during intensive lesson preparation phases | 475 |
| Teaching packs | 50 |
| Paint for marking out, circuit diagram, murals and posters | 65 |
| Soil, compost, plants, sticks, pots etc for garden | 275 |
| Contingency, to be allocated according to need as project progresses | 185 |
| On-going maintainance of garden and equipment - within school budget | 0 |
| TOTAL | 5000 |